Poll: sorting to-dos by priority

[Volker Krause]

On Montag, 14. Juni 2021 23:24:13 CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Montag, 14. Juni 2021 22:18:31 CEST Glen Ditchfield wrote:
> > The iCalendar standard defines a priority to be a single-digit integer,
> > with 1 being the highest priority and 9 being the lowest.  So, if you
> > sort a list of to-dos by priority in ascending order, what do you expect
> > to see?> 
> >  A) 1, 2, 3, ... 9 (lowest to highest number)
> >  B) 9, 8, 7, ... 1 (lowest to highest priority)
> > 
> > KOrganizer's printed to-do list uses order A, due to code in the
> > KCalendarCore library, but the on-screen to-do list uses order B.  I'd
> > like
> > to pick one.
> 
> I would expect the to-dos to be printed in the same order as they are
> displayed. 

Same here.

> Further, I'd expect to be able to choose whether I want the
> to-dos to be sorted by ascending or descending order of priority.

And if that's not available, I'd expect highest priority first as the default 
order.

Regards,
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20210615/4a0fe41a/attachment.sig>