[Kde-pim] Akonadi architectural knowledge

[Morten Larsen]

Hi,

Thanks a million Andras, your answers are very useful to me.

On 05/10/12 10:06, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Morten Larsen wrote:
>> f) Do you get and answer questions in the mailing list or IRC channels
>> which can be considered to be architectural in nature (i.e. not on low
>> level design such as detailed questions on the API)?
> I'm not sure what architecture means in this context for you. The base
> architecture, how the server and clients communicate is quite set in stone,
> it is not easy to change without massively breaking stuff.
That is exactly what I mean by architecture: The early, high-level 
fundamental design decisions which are very hard to change later on. 
What I meant to uncover with this question is whether the architecture 
is well understood by non-Akonadi developers. If many developers were 
asking questions related to the fundamental architecture, this could 
indicate that the architectural knowledge was not readily available to 
developers outside the group, i.e. that the dissemination of knowledge 
was not working (either that the information was hard to find or 
difficult to understand).

Morten
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/