[Kde-pim] Git migration rules

[Torgny Nyblom]

On Tuesday 09 March 2010 15.51.14 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > On Monday 08 March 2010 21.23.26 Thomas McGuire wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> On Monday 08 March 2010 21:04:28 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> >> > [..]
> >> > And then there's a whole bunch of private work branches I didn't look
> >> > into.
> >> 
> >> branches/work/~vkrause had some interesting branches.
> > 
> > Guess it's not that hard to extract all relevant branches however should
> > we try and follow some sort of naming convention? If so any suggestions?
> 
> If a branch has already been merged, does it need a name? Can't we just
> keep its history and not give it a name?

Yes but... Then we need to be certain about what branches we should keep since 
all others (not merged with history) will be lost.

So if someone can give me a list of these branches and we are 100% sure about 
them, yes.

/Torgny
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/