[Kde-pim] Git migration rules

[Stephen Kelly]

Torgny Nyblom wrote:

> On Monday 08 March 2010 21.23.26 Thomas McGuire wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Monday 08 March 2010 21:04:28 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>> > [..]
>> > And then there's a whole bunch of private work branches I didn't look
>> > into.
>> 
>> branches/work/~vkrause had some interesting branches.
> 
> Guess it's not that hard to extract all relevant branches however should
> we try and follow some sort of naming convention? If so any suggestions?

If a branch has already been merged, does it need a name? Can't we just keep 
its history and not give it a name?

> 
> /Torgny
> _______________________________________________
> KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
> KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/



_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/