[Kde-pim] Re: Review Request: Support recursive collection syncronization

[Andras Mantia]

Will Stephenson wrote:

> On Sunday 12 Dec 2010 11:31:21 Andras Mantia wrote:
>> > On 2010-12-11 21:43:18, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>> > > I object against changing the action bound to F5. F5 should always
>> > > only reload/refresh the current object. This is how F5 works in all
>> > > applications I know. I suggest using Ctrl+F5 for recursive sync. This
>> > > would be in line with Konqueror's (normal) Reload (F5) vs. Force
>> > > Reload (Ctrl+F5).
>> > > 
>> > > Note: I didn't have a look at the actual patch.
>> 
>> Seems I remembered wrongly, and KMail1 doesn't sync the folders
>> recursively. In that case I withdraw the F5 assignment to be the default,
>> but would like to change that if sync is called on the toplevel
>> collection, than it is a sync collection (or recursive sync), and not a
>> non-recursive sync of the toplevel collection. This is in line of what
>> happens in KMail1.
> 
> In the case that the toplevel collection is inbox and all other folders
> are children of inbox, how would you sync inbox only?

The toplevel connection cannot be Inbox. It is Local Folder, IMAP Account or 
such. Inbox is always one level below.

Andras


_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/