[Kde-pim] Re: Review Request: Support recursive collection syncronization

[Will Stephenson]

On Sunday 12 Dec 2010 11:31:21 Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On 2010-12-11 21:43:18, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > I object against changing the action bound to F5. F5 should always only
> > > reload/refresh the current object. This is how F5 works in all
> > > applications I know. I suggest using Ctrl+F5 for recursive sync. This
> > > would be in line with Konqueror's (normal) Reload (F5) vs. Force
> > > Reload (Ctrl+F5).
> > > 
> > > Note: I didn't have a look at the actual patch.
> 
> Seems I remembered wrongly, and KMail1 doesn't sync the folders
> recursively. In that case I withdraw the F5 assignment to be the default,
> but would like to change that if sync is called on the toplevel
> collection, than it is a sync collection (or recursive sync), and not a
> non-recursive sync of the toplevel collection. This is in line of what
> happens in KMail1.

In the case that the toplevel collection is inbox and all other folders are 
children of inbox, how would you sync inbox only?

Will
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/