[Kde-pim] Re: Do we need a Beta3?

[Adrian von Bidder]

Heyho!

On Friday 10 December 2010 16.15:22 Thomas McGuire wrote:
>  [...] because nobody really is managing the work.

Perhaps this is the message that should be public?  KDEPIM does sorely need 
a maintainer (team) who will officially take the blame^Wresponsibility for 
what's going on and have ideas where it could be going [1].  Obviously 
announcing this (and the status "there is currently no release planned until 
this issue is addressed" as a consequence) is not good for publicity, but 
neither is releasing a very buggy package, nor is postponing releases again 
and again.

Yes, I won't step up nor get really involved with the code.  -ENOTIME and 
all this, which obviously means I'm in the glasshouse.  Shoot me.

cheers
-- vbi

[1] And I'm not saying any of the developers currently involved should take 
this on.  If they don't have the time/motivation/..., that's fine.  Freedom 
to hack on software is also freedom not do do stuff.

-- 
Das Leben ist kurz, aber man hat immer Zeit für Höflichkeit.
		-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20101210/a5ac2d13/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/