[Kde-pim] Review Request: Implementation for RecurrenceRule::operator=()

[Kevin Krammer]

> On 2009-03-09 06:46:55, Allen Winter wrote:
> > looks fine.  do me a favor and add some apidox for this operator.  actually, it looks like recurrencerule.h needs quite a bit of apidox.. that's another issue.

What sould that API doc say?
"Assigns given @p other to this instance?"

I haven't used this or related classes yet, so I would probably have to reverse engineer what the other methods do


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/260/#review426
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2009-03-08 14:42:57, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/260/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2009-03-08 14:42:57)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE PIM and David Jarvie.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Basically copy&paste of the things done by the existing copy constructor.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepimlibs/kcal/recurrencerule.cpp 936888 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/260/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/