[Kde-pim] License change.

Daniel Molkentin daniel at molkentin.de
Sun Jun 24 12:39:22 BST 2007


Am Samstag 23 Juni 2007 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > So I would like to know how to proceed. I see a few options:
> > 1) people agree with the GPL->LGPL requests
> > 2) we lift the LGPL requirement for kdepimlibs
> > 3) we create a kdepimlibs-gpl with gpl libraries
> >
> > Personally I don't need it to be LGPL so I would go for option 2 and
> > let the parties who do require LGPL to worry about needed license
> > changes.
>
> I don't think 1) is an option for the crypto stuff (but you can of
> course ask Marc :-) ). I am very much in favor of 3).

Sorry, but I think this is insane. Creating a module just for the sake of the 
license... What is the deal with relicensing the stuff under LGPL anyway? 
They are libs, and they were always meant to be. Marc, what are your 
objections?

Cheers,
  Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20070624/51662c95/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/


More information about the kde-pim mailing list