[Kde-pim] License change.

[Till Adam]

On Sunday 24 June 2007 15:33, Rudolf Germer wrote:
> Tobias Koenig wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 01:39:22PM +0200, Daniel Molkentin wrote:
> > > What is the deal with relicensing the stuff under LGPL anyway?
> > > They are libs, and they were always meant to be.

[snip]

Please, folks, this is not the place to have this discussion. The parties 
involved have very informed opinions as to why they want their libraries to 
be GPL, or LGPL. I doubt very much that they will be convinced otherwise by 
re-hashing the same arguments both sides have exchanged countless times 
already, here and elsewhere. The pragmatic options are on the table, Tom has 
kindly summarised them for us. I prefer option 3 as well, since it is clearer 
for users of our libraries, especially potential proprietary ones, even if it 
means a bit more work. As was pointed out before, the primary target audience 
for these libraries is ourselves, and others in KDE, which means folks who 
will have no problem with them being GPL.

Cheers,

Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20070624/845fd71d/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/