Comparing KHTML in Quanta and Konq

[Waldo Bastian]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 22 May 2003 21:42, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2003 06:07, Dik Takken wrote:
> > I was wondering if others can confirm this and if someone can explain the
> > enormous performance difference between the two 'browsers'.
>
> i can confirm this. the rendering is the same (subjective) speed in both
> konqueror and quanta, but it's everything that leads up to the rendering in
> konqueror that seems so much slower. which is understandable since quanta
> doesn't have any toolbars to update and doesn't support nearly as many
> viewing modes or plugins as Konqueror does (at least, AFAIK).
>
> the question probably isn't one of rendering speed, but everything that
> Konqueror does between clicking on a link and getting the data to khtml for
> rendering. at least that's what i'd guess ;-)

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52022 suggests it may be due to 
konq_history.

Cheers,
Waldo
- -- 
bastian at kde.org -=|[ SuSE, The Linux Desktop Experts ]|=- bastian at suse.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+1JK9N4pvrENfboIRAuDVAKCpXSzDKSNLMYkqH4eQGIP2zYLg/wCggH46
TTnPUPGGx0xwuIFrIF6v5C4=
=hUro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----