Comparing KHTML in Quanta and Konq

George Staikos staikos at kde.org
Wed May 28 10:08:14 CEST 2003


On Wednesday 28 May 2003 06:43, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2003 21:42, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 May 2003 06:07, Dik Takken wrote:
> > > I was wondering if others can confirm this and if someone can explain
> > > the enormous performance difference between the two 'browsers'.
> >
> > i can confirm this. the rendering is the same (subjective) speed in both
> > konqueror and quanta, but it's everything that leads up to the rendering
> > in konqueror that seems so much slower. which is understandable since
> > quanta doesn't have any toolbars to update and doesn't support nearly as
> > many viewing modes or plugins as Konqueror does (at least, AFAIK).
> >
> > the question probably isn't one of rendering speed, but everything that
> > Konqueror does between clicking on a link and getting the data to khtml
> > for rendering. at least that's what i'd guess ;-)
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52022 suggests it may be due to
> konq_history.

  I wouldn't rule out the konqueror crash plugin too.  If I try to select that 
menu entry on dual-athlon right now it takes over 8 minutes and counting for 
the sub-menu to appear.  The CPU load wasn't high on the machine, but the 
entire desktop was frozen (save the mouse pointer).  I had to log in remotely 
to kill the konqi process.  Alex is going to fix it he says.

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/



More information about the Kde-optimize mailing list