Comparing KHTML in Quanta and Konq

[Aaron J. Seigo]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 26 May 2003 12:13, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Don, 22 Mai 2003, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > i can confirm this. the rendering is the same (subjective) speed in both
> > konqueror and quanta, but it's everything that leads up to the rendering
> > in konqueror that seems so much slower. which is understandable since
> > quanta doesn't have any toolbars to update and doesn't support nearly as
> > many viewing modes or plugins as Konqueror does (at least, AFAIK).
>
> do you have a slow DNS server?

not particularly, no...

> I've noticed that there are a terrible amount of DNS lookups done which
> hang if you don't have a local caching nameserver.

and Quanta doesn't do these lookups? in other words, does KHTML or Konqueror 
do the lookups? remember that this is using Quanta to browse the web (which 
means resolution of domain names)... i don't have a local caching nameserver 
running ATM, but it would be trivial to fire it up and test that if Quanta 
doesn't do these looks and Konqueror does... 

- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE: The 'K' is for 'kick ass'
http://www.kde.org       http://promo.kde.org/3.1/feature_guide.php
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+0mEf1rcusafx20MRAsMfAJ9WDCOGVwYcEPSqFVoy1MDwMofmSwCdFQCi
ROexWFN5MZi+emZZ23lZk/Y=
=6yo2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----