Comparing KHTML in Quanta and Konq

[Aaron J. Seigo]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 21 May 2003 06:07, Dik Takken wrote:
> I was wondering if others can confirm this and if someone can explain the
> enormous performance difference between the two 'browsers'.

i can confirm this. the rendering is the same (subjective) speed in both 
konqueror and quanta, but it's everything that leads up to the rendering in 
konqueror that seems so much slower. which is understandable since quanta 
doesn't have any toolbars to update and doesn't support nearly as many 
viewing modes or plugins as Konqueror does (at least, AFAIK).

the question probably isn't one of rendering speed, but everything that 
Konqueror does between clicking on a link and getting the data to khtml for 
rendering. at least that's what i'd guess ;-)

- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE: The 'K' is for 'kick ass'
http://www.kde.org       http://promo.kde.org/3.1/feature_guide.php
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+zShB1rcusafx20MRAqQlAJ9pCHfYyXetWGYLE0+FDTRVamnoCwCePznV
qwBsvjn7nIex62GrGdHhfzI=
=TC3M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----