KDE 4 Multimedia: The Answer
leon at magic.shiman.com
Tue Feb 24 17:41:35 GMT 2004
on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:23:43 +0100 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>Subject: Re: KDE 4 Multimedia: The Answer
>On Tuesday 24 February 2004 12:16, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
>> little less that MAS, but MAS seems to lag in community
>We can fix that by using it ;-)
that would be great. We can help by becoming more active and
responsive within the community.
>>From what I heard until now it seems that gstreamer is more the
>and MAS could very well be used as the network transparency layer
We agreee this could certainly be looked at.
>OTOH we have actually 4 possibilities: arts, gstreamer, MAS, NMM,
>combinations between them...
>> mplayer/xine are the best apps we can compare them to.
>> How much memory/CPU does framework XYZ use? how much
>> How many frames are dropped, how many are out of sync with
>> how many with mplayer/xine?
>> This are the benchmark I was thing about.
>Yes, good idea. But it requires some work to get good numbers.
E.g. "out of
>sync" is a vague term, hard to count.
We could participate in this, having done a lot of benchmarking,
only some of which has been discussed in public.
>> > What other portable, mdoular
>> > multimedia interface that does audio and video did you have in
>> The one MNN provides. The one MNN provides _now_ and GStreamer
>> provide in a few releases (maybe the gst one will be even
better, I'm not
>> an expert, I can't judge).
>I don't have anything against NMM, but since it is a university
>it be possible that the responsible professors might want to keep
>control over the project ? Which means that it might happen that
>practical issues might be the most important for them ?
>Work: alexander.neundorf at jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
>Home: neundorf at kde.org - http://www.kde.org
> alex at neundorf.net - http://www.neundorf.net
>kde-multimedia mailing list
>kde-multimedia at kde.org
More information about the kde-multimedia