[Kde-mobile-users] Re: Maemo/N900: KMail Touch very slow and unresponsive

Yuen Hoe Lim yuenhoe86 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 18 19:10:29 CET 2011


I've recently also installed Kontact Touch on n900 and am also seeing this.
On the other hand, testing it with another,  much smaller, account, it works
far more responsively.

----
Jason "moofang" Lim Yuen Hoe
http://yuenhoe.co.cc/



2011/2/19 Frederik Vogelsang <frederik.vogelsang at googlemail.com>

> Hi,
>
> first of all I would like to thank the Kontact Touch developers for the
> effort they put into porting KMail/Kontact to mobile devices.
>
> I just gave KMail Touch a try (the experimental version) and I am very
> impressed by the UI and general look and feel. However I am suffering from
> severe performance problems. This is my setup:
>
> 1. N900 with latest software updates
> 2. Kontact Touch from experimental repositories
> 3. One single GMail IMAP account configured in KMail (I have about 1,6GB of
> messages in my INBOX and 5 IMAP folders).
>
> I understand that initial fetching of emails might take a long time. I let
> the device sit there for a few hours in order to fetch the mails from the
> server. What seems strange is that whenever I launch KMail again it takes
> forever to launch and fetch new mails (20 minutes), even after the initial
> fetching is done.
>
> akonadi and akonadi_imap_resource both seem to consume *a lot* of CPU -
> overclocking to 800MHz did not make a difference. When launching KMail the
> entire OS becomes unresponsive and basically unusable. This is every time I
> launch KMail. Rebooting the N900 makes things worse - launching KMail after
> a reboot feels like it does initial fetching again.
>
> The other thing is that it also takes forever to actually open an IMAP
> folder. For me it takes ~5 minutes per folder. Is this expected?
>
> KMail on my desktop does not have these issues (same IMAP account). The
> default N900 email client is also pretty fast when fetching emails from
> GMail.
>
> Do you have any idea what could be wrong? Is this normal behaviour of the
> experimental version? Is this going to change?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Frederik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-mobile-users mailing list
> Kde-mobile-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mobile-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mobile-users/attachments/20110219/218fad0e/attachment.htm 


More information about the Kde-mobile-users mailing list