[KDE/Mac] here there be updates

[Leo Franchi]

On 22 Jan 2009, at 16:25, Chris Jones wrote:

>
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 8:03PM, Big O wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> wouldn't it be better if we just put aliases in
>>>> /Applications/Macports/KDE4, much like QT's apps?
>>>> so we'd have macports app in their /opt/local/ directory, and a
>>>> quick
>>>> link in /Applications
>>>>
>>>> anybody agrees?
>>>
>>> +1 here
>> We could do that but why "/Applications/Macports/KDE4" as opposed to
>> "/
>> Applications/Macports"?
>> It would look neater but beyond that's what's the advantage?
>
> Well, it is just a matter of opinion, but for me it is just nice to
> organize things like this. Qt4 has /Applications/Macports/Qt,
> similarly my various python installs have their own dub-dirs.
> Personally I would like to have all the KDE4 apps in their own sub-
> dir, rather than have them cluttering up the root /Applications/
> Macports directory... Just my 2 pence worth.
>
> BTW, is it possible for the KDE applications to have their proper
> icons ? At the moment they all get some default icon here. Not exactly
> high priority...

I have been trying and failing to get the icons to show up in the  
finder (for amarok).

I have put amarok.icns in Resources/  and made sure Info.plist  
specifies amarok.icns as the icon, but no dice. I have also tried  
Amarok.icns as the executable name is Amarok ). what is interesting is  
that i have the amarok icon in the doc and systray and everywhere else  
when amarok is running---just not in the finder.

any tips appreciated.

cheers,
leo
---
Leo Franchi				(650) 704 3680
Tufts University 2010

lfranchi at kde.org
leonardo.franchi at tufts.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mac/attachments/20090122/e4e08a83/attachment.htm