[kde-linux] question about KDE versions

Louis Hinman lou at manhattanhandyman.com
Mon Oct 26 14:03:56 UTC 2009


Thanks for your thoughtful reply, Duncan.

I figured that was the reason.  I hope to participate in a modest way in KDE 
developement sometime in the near future, so thanks also for the info about 
doing that.

Best Reagards,

Lou Hinman
New York City

On Saturday 24 October 2009 06:01:14 am Duncan wrote:
> Louis Hinman posted on Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:28:53 -0400 as excerpted:
> > If I were to upgrade to KDE 4.2.4, would I find the manuals better
> > conformed to versions?
>
> Some better, some worse.  One of the things Linux has problems with is
> outdated documentation.  The generally agreed reason is that it's not as
> much fun to write documentation as it is to code new features or even to
> fix bugs, so it tends not to get done very quickly, and when it does,
> it's soon outdated.
>
> kde4 does tend to have more upto date documentation... where it has it.
> But a lot of it simply isn't there yet.  And in other cases, the old and
> now even /worse/ outdated documentation was just carried forward, tho in
> my experience that's for the non-kde-core apps.
>
> Of course, one thing users who can't code can help with is the
> documentation.  If you'd like, and have the time to contribute, Anne can
> probably get you hooked up with the right people to get started.
> Alternatively, on the "What's this?" features in kde4, if they're not
> described yet, there's a link you can click that allows you to describe
> it and send it to the kde folks so they can add it.  That takes far less
> time than volunteering for the docs team, and doesn't have the commitment
> either.  You just send one here or there whenever you see something not
> documented and know what it does so can help.







More information about the kde-linux mailing list