[Kde-imaging] kipi-plugins 0.1.4 beta1 available for testing

[Angelo Naselli]

Alle mercoledì 6 giugno 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> Angelo Naselli wrote:
> 
> > Alle martedì 5 giugno 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> >> Angelo Naselli wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Anyway I've uploaded a new tarball onto
> >> > http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins that one does not contain
> >> > docs, since this release is a beta and we have problems compilig that
> >> > part. Can you test if this package is ok please.
> >> 
> >> much better, though I still needed the patch I posted
> >> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-imaging/2007-May/005004.html
> >> to build --with-libgpod
> 
> > Are you sure it's not a distro specific problem?
> > [root at gandalf PACK]# urpmf libgobject
> > lib64glib2.0_0:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
> > lib64glib2.0_0:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11
> > lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.a
> > lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.la
> > lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so
> > 
> > As far as i can say glib-2.0 seems to be enough here...
> 
> distro-specific, possibly, in that Fedora tries it's best not to rely on
> libtool .la files (in fact, we try to omit them whenever possible).
> 
> If you're relying on the presense of glib-2.0's .la file, that may contain
> references to libgobject, it may work for you.  
Well i rely on the fact that libglib2-devel package has libobject-2.0.la
and that's why the data i own are ok.
When i say "distro specific" i mean that maybe fedora added one more package for
that and so you cannot find it.
Anyway there's no way to check if you have installed libfoo package and not libfoo-devel
to build your code but using pkg-config tools. (at least i believe).
> 
> Does 
> $ grep libgobject /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.la
> find anything? :)
silly question for good point :)
Of course it doesn't find anything, if you see above you'll see 
lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.la and that is the right place ;)
but the package is always libglib2.0....

Anyway, if some distro changes that behaviour we can release your patch. I believe
it's safe or, at least, not dangerous :)

Angelo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-imaging/attachments/20070606/90e1c26c/attachment.pgp