[Kde-imaging] kipi-plugins 0.1.4 beta1 available for testing

[Rex Dieter]

Angelo Naselli wrote:

> Alle martedì 5 giugno 2007, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
>> Angelo Naselli wrote:
>> 
>> > Anyway I've uploaded a new tarball onto
>> > http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins that one does not contain
>> > docs, since this release is a beta and we have problems compilig that
>> > part. Can you test if this package is ok please.
>> 
>> much better, though I still needed the patch I posted
>> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-imaging/2007-May/005004.html
>> to build --with-libgpod

> Are you sure it's not a distro specific problem?
> [root at gandalf PACK]# urpmf libgobject
> lib64glib2.0_0:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
> lib64glib2.0_0:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11
> lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.a
> lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.la
> lib64glib2.0_0-devel:/usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so
> 
> As far as i can say glib-2.0 seems to be enough here...

distro-specific, possibly, in that Fedora tries it's best not to rely on
libtool .la files (in fact, we try to omit them whenever possible).

If you're relying on the presense of glib-2.0's .la file, that may contain
references to libgobject, it may work for you.  

Does 
$ grep libgobject /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.la
find anything? :)

If that's the case, I'd argue, that relying upon libtool indirect
dependencies to pull in symbols that you directly use, is unwise, at best.

-- Rex