[Kde-hardware-devel] Solid UPnP GSoC idea

[Kevin Ottens]

On Thursday 8 April 2010 12:12:04 Bart Cerneels wrote:
> We should make HUPnP part of the proposal then. But with some
> abstraction to allow different backends. Some platforms have native
> backends that can not be bypassed because of resource and security
> restrictions.

Well, as far as libsolid is concerned obviously no need for such an 
abstraction. Who would want to abstract the abstraction that libsolid is? ;-)

We can have several different UPnP backends in there, some being built or not 
depending on the platform (to ensure using the native facilities if needed). 

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20100409/dd27aae0/attachment.sig