[Kde-games-devel] GIT Conversion status

Stefan Majewsky stefan.majewsky at googlemail.com
Mon Apr 30 17:30:08 UTC 2012


On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Ian Wadham <iandw.au at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmmm … I was proposing, on the "deliverables" thread, that the QML
> students should work in playground/games or the GIT equivalent. Isn't
> that where new contributions usually go?  I would not like to see QML
> code and C++ code intermixed in the release stream until we are ready
> to start releasing QML games.

playground/games is great for new apps, but not quite for feature
work. In the SVN-only era, the correct place would have been
branches/work IMO. Since the Git move is already anticipated, working
in a Git feature branch is the natural solution to me.

You do not need to be concerned about the possibility that the Git
move might be delayed: In this case, one can easily rebase the commits
stored in Git into a Git-SVN repo to commit to SVN then. I'm relying
on such a workflow since over two years, as do at least Parker and
Wolfgang.

If no one objects, I'll set up two repos tomorrow. (Tomorrow is a
holiday in Germany, and I have quite some household and kdegames tasks
in my backlog.)

Greetings
Stefan


More information about the kde-games-devel mailing list