[Kde-games-devel] GIT Conversion status

[Ian Wadham]

On 01/05/2012, at 3:30 AM, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Ian Wadham <iandw.au at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hmmmm … I was proposing, on the "deliverables" thread, that the QML
>> students should work in playground/games or the GIT equivalent. Isn't
>> that where new contributions usually go?  I would not like to see QML
>> code and C++ code intermixed in the release stream until we are ready
>> to start releasing QML games.
> 
> playground/games is great for new apps, but not quite for feature
> work. In the SVN-only era, the correct place would have been
> branches/work IMO. Since the Git move is already anticipated, working
> in a Git feature branch is the natural solution to me.
> 
> You do not need to be concerned about the possibility that the Git
> move might be delayed: In this case, one can easily rebase the commits
> stored in Git into a Git-SVN repo to commit to SVN then. I'm relying
> on such a workflow since over two years, as do at least Parker and
> Wolfgang.
> 
> If no one objects, I'll set up two repos tomorrow. (Tomorrow is a
> holiday in Germany, and I have quite some household and kdegames tasks
> in my backlog.)

Yes.  Go for it, Stefan!

Playground is ruled out for reasons discussed in this thread on 29/30 April.

Have a good day, Ian W.