[Kde-games-devel] granatier
Arturo Silva
jasilva28 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 19:45:03 CEST 2009
=====================================================
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
=====================================================
> Argh, that gives me another idea. Not sure if this should be a 'bad
> bonus' or just an all-the-time thing, but have you thought at all about
> 'dud' bombs? Basically they fail to explode on their own and become
> impassible (but you can kick them). They blow up if another explosion
> touches them.
Hmmm, sounds a bit tricky to code, but it could certainly act like a
"Restrain" affect (but you wouldn't necessarily be as helpless). ^^
>
> And... ooh, this is evil, what about walls that contain bombs that go
> off when you blow the wall? Maybe that /would/ be too evil, at least if
> you don't mark them. I can see a player doing this:
>
> █☺█
> ☢▒
> █ █
>
> ...and not knowing that the block (▒) has a bomb inside... Ouch.
fufu, well I'm kinda hoping the arena_mine could serve this purpose.
Actually, we still have to figure out how arena_mine will work. After
all, it's hard to fall for a mine if you can clearly see it -- I
wonder if it should be able to initially hide under walls and such.
>
> The new ice is... amazing. Wow :-).
O-tay! ^^
>
> The mortar... well, it's also amazing, but it doesn't look like a tile
> :-). Maybe it works in practice, but I'm not sure about the non-top-down
> perspective. (It would make a fabulous bonus, though...) Though I'm also
> wondering how much it should look like something you could walk over.
Yes, my first attention was to create a top-down mortar -- however the
angled view made it a little more recognizable as one. ^^
Still, I can also quickly draft up a top-down version so you two can
decide. My Plan B is to use the current mortar for the "bonus_throw"
icon in the event it doesn't make the cut. ^__^
--Arturo
More information about the kde-games-devel
mailing list