Kio vs encfs vs Kate: exec permission

[Arnaldo Candido Junior]

Thank's for the quick answer.

Yes, I'm using encfs locally in my Kubuntu 16.04. Some details follow below.

I'm not using any mount options. Umask under the folder returns 0002. I
don't think it's an umask problem, since vim, touch and stdout redirection
seem to work as expected.

How to reproduce this behavior (considering encfs installed).

$ mkdir src dst
$ encfs $(pwd)/src $(pwd)/dst
$ touch dst/a.txt
$ vim dst/a.txt # until now, no exec permission
$ kate dst/a.txt # after saving, the permission will change

Best regards,
Arnaldo

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Dominik Haumann <dhaumann at kde.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Arnaldo Candido Junior
> <arnaldoponto at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm using encfs to encrypt some of my folders. Whenever I use Kate to
> edit
> > and save any file under these folders, the file receives exec permission.
> >
> > I suppose this is a bug. Kate developers advised me to contact Kio
> > developers.
> >
> > I would like to ask if there is any workaround to solve this.
>
> I assume you use encfs to mount a partition and then use this folder
> as if it were a local folder and files, right?
>
> In that case, it is unlikely that it is KIO's fault. What are your
> mount options? What does `umask` say in a folder in the konsole ?
>
> Btw, the file owner may change, since Kate uses QSaveFile: It first
> saves to a temporary file in the same folder, and on success, removes
> the old one and renames the new one.
>
> Greetings
> Dominik
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20161107/51bb7d1f/attachment.html>