Review Request 129666: [KNotificationRestrictions] Let user can specify restriction reason string
Anthony Fieroni
bvbfan at abv.bg
Sat Dec 17 17:17:19 UTC 2016
> On Дек. 17, 2016, 5:53 след обяд, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > Just because it "looks annoying" doesn't mean it doesn't have its use.
> >
> > I'll do the git-blame-search for you: https://cgit.kde.org/knotifications.git/commit/?id=3f080d44af41d0158d7b5c51269449e78d5b128f
I will correct GwenView too, about me this patch is at wrong place
> On Дек. 17, 2016, 5:53 след обяд, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > src/knotificationrestrictions.h, line 97
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/diff/1/?file=487739#file487739line97>
> >
> > Why?
If new contructor is accepted, old one can be omitted.
- Anthony
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/#review101483
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Дек. 17, 2016, 5:48 след обяд, Anthony Fieroni wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Дек. 17, 2016, 5:48 след обяд)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Klapetek.
>
>
> Repository: knotifications
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> "no_reason_specified" looks annoying reason
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/knotificationrestrictions.h e9179ae
> src/knotificationrestrictions.cpp 5f5d908
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony Fieroni
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20161217/14cfa20b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list