Review Request 129666: [KNotificationRestrictions] Let user can specify restriction reason string

Anthony Fieroni bvbfan at abv.bg
Sat Dec 17 17:17:19 UTC 2016



> On Дек. 17, 2016, 5:53 след обяд, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > Just because it "looks annoying" doesn't mean it doesn't have its use. 
> > 
> > I'll do the git-blame-search for you: https://cgit.kde.org/knotifications.git/commit/?id=3f080d44af41d0158d7b5c51269449e78d5b128f

I will correct GwenView too, about me this patch is at wrong place


> On Дек. 17, 2016, 5:53 след обяд, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > src/knotificationrestrictions.h, line 97
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/diff/1/?file=487739#file487739line97>
> >
> >     Why?

If new contructor is accepted, old one can be omitted.


- Anthony


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/#review101483
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Дек. 17, 2016, 5:48 след обяд, Anthony Fieroni wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Дек. 17, 2016, 5:48 след обяд)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Klapetek.
> 
> 
> Repository: knotifications
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> "no_reason_specified" looks annoying reason
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/knotificationrestrictions.h e9179ae 
>   src/knotificationrestrictions.cpp 5f5d908 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129666/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anthony Fieroni
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20161217/14cfa20b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list