KTextEditor & Frameworks question

[David Faure]

On Tuesday 07 January 2014 21:12:39 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> Yeah, 2 => 4, all right, wanted that anyway since long.
> Only the autotests/input stuff should be best left untouched. That is no
> "source" in that case only input for tests, and yeah, I guess they won't
> like that.

OK, reverted that subdir, and committed.
 
> > It's a lib that provides API, not an integration plugin.
> 
> Hmm, but it installs a kpart, too, is that still ok?

Sure.
This doesn't change the basic rule:
Provide non-deprecated API -> tier1/2/3.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5