Tier status of attica & kwallet

[David Faure]

On Friday 24 January 2014 20:33:14 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote:
> > > On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > >>> On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > >>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > >>> Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also
> > >>> includes
> > >>> kwalletd which definitely is not tier 2, and there does not appear to
> > >>> be
> > >>> any option to control building them independently.
> > >> 
> > >> I'll add that option asap.
> > > 
> > > Is that useful?  Would anyone have any use for the library without the
> > > daemon?
> 
> Once, David F. told on this mailing list that such an option would let an Qt
> application compile against KF5Walllet. The daemon is a runtime dependency.

I can't remember if I said that, and if so what I had in mind.

Compiling against a crippled framework and then missing the daemon for it to 
work at runtime sounds a bit strange.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5