Why is KConfig tier2?

[Aleix Pol]

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:17 PM, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:

> Le samedi 22 juin 2013 13:03:22 Aleix Pol a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > We've been looking through some code scratching our heads on how we can
> do
> > it to workaround uses of KConfig because of it being tier2.
> >
> > Then we decided to look at it and we saw that KConfigCore and KConfigGui
> > only seems to depend on Qt.
> >
> > So, maybe it could be moved to tier1?
>
> Yes, it's tier1 now, since I put QLockFile in Qt.
>
> (It was using kcoreaddons before, for KLockFile).
>
> Back then I thought "let's not move it, all this will move again anyway",
> but
> clearly it's confusing people, so yes, please move it :-)
>
> --
> David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
> Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
>
>
Ok, so yes, it's misleading to have it in tier2. Or well, are tiers
documented anywhere? We've been looking for it too and haven't found
anything yet.

Aleix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130622/61e6daca/attachment.html>