KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

[Chusslove Illich]

> [: Kevin Ottens :]
> Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making
> ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)...
> Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to discuss with
> Chusslove or consider using tr() I'm afraid.

In the case of JavaScript interpreter, ki18n can either depend on QtScript
or on KJS; either way that is one dependency extra, and I'd rather stick
with KJS. This is because I don't like the drama with JavaScript engines, in
which Qt must participate, while KJS can remain its "boring self".
I consider this outweighing the advantage of a tier 1 label.

Then, ki18n should also begin to depend on a locale and on a config
provider, and to me it is still unclear which these will be.

-- 
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130702/97b7d843/attachment.sig>