KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

[Stephen Kelly]

Chusslove Illich wrote:

>> [: Kevin Ottens :]
>> Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making
>> ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)...
>> Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to discuss with
>> Chusslove or consider using tr() I'm afraid.
> 
> In the case of JavaScript interpreter, ki18n can either depend on QtScript
> or on KJS; either way that is one dependency extra, and I'd rather stick
> with KJS. This is because I don't like the drama with JavaScript engines,
> in which Qt must participate, while KJS can remain its "boring self".
> I consider this outweighing the advantage of a tier 1 label.

As far as I understand, the ki18n library does not depend on a javascript 
engine, but only the separate ktranscript plugin does?

Note that QtScript can't be loaded in a plugin, so using it in KTranscript 
relies on that changing anyway:

 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38193

Thanks,

Steve.