Removing nepomuk from the frameworks branch?

[David Faure]

On Wednesday 01 February 2012 13:01:36 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> OK, dunno why I assumed you already removed it from the build a while ago.
> 
> I see. Well it has the "go" from my POV. Is anyone against? Speak now or
> never. :-)

KIO and kparts optionally use nepomuk, but the first one has KIO_NO_NEPOMUK and 
the second one has HAVE_NEPOMUK, so it should be fine, go for it.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Sponsored by Nokia to work on KDE, incl. KDE Frameworks 5