Removing nepomuk from the frameworks branch?

[Stephen Kelly]

David Faure wrote:

> On Wednesday 01 February 2012 13:01:36 Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> OK, dunno why I assumed you already removed it from the build a while
>> ago.
>> 
>> I see. Well it has the "go" from my POV. Is anyone against? Speak now or
>> never. :-)
> 
> KIO and kparts optionally use nepomuk, but the first one has
> KIO_NO_NEPOMUK and the second one has HAVE_NEPOMUK, so it should be fine,
> go for it.
> 

Done. Thanks.