[kde-edu]: Review Request: Kig: use antialiasing for QPainter

[Aleix Pol]

It's really hard to quantify because there's quite some work relying on the
X11.

A good test would be to see something that can't be drawn usably with
antialias while without works fine.

Aleix

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Paolini <paolini at dmf.unicatt.it>wrote:

> In my opinion kig would benefit from the improved quality of the drawing,
> for example in a comparison with 'geogebra'.
>
> Perhaps one thing that is presently lacking is a configuration panel in
> which the user could control some quality features.  Another one could be
> the precision in curve drawings; in one recent post the issue of the
> presentation of iperbolae was raised which is a related subject.
>
> Is it possible to quantify how much slower would be the painting?
>
> Maurizio
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 04:49:00PM -0000, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5444/#review7792
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > This will make drawing a really lot slower for more complex objects
> (polygons, loci, for example).
> > Please don't trade a subjective "looking" with an obective "really slow
> painting".
> >
> > - Pino
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-edu/attachments/20100925/6a22783c/attachment.htm