It's really hard to quantify because there's quite some work relying on the X11.<div><br></div><div>A good test would be to see something that can't be drawn usably with antialias while without works fine.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Aleix<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Paolini <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paolini@dmf.unicatt.it">paolini@dmf.unicatt.it</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
In my opinion kig would benefit from the improved quality of the drawing,<br>
for example in a comparison with 'geogebra'.<br>
<br>
Perhaps one thing that is presently lacking is a configuration panel in<br>
which the user could control some quality features. Another one could be<br>
the precision in curve drawings; in one recent post the issue of the<br>
presentation of iperbolae was raised which is a related subject.<br>
<br>
Is it possible to quantify how much slower would be the painting?<br>
<br>
Maurizio<br>
<br>
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 04:49:00PM -0000, Pino Toscano wrote:<br>
><br>
> -----------------------------------------------------------<br>
<div class="im">> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:<br>
</div>> <a href="http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5444/#review7792" target="_blank">http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5444/#review7792</a><br>
> -----------------------------------------------------------<br>
<div class="im">><br>
><br>
> This will make drawing a really lot slower for more complex objects (polygons, loci, for example).<br>
> Please don't trade a subjective "looking" with an obective "really slow painting".<br>
><br>
> - Pino<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>_______________________________________________<br>
kde-edu mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde-edu@mail.kde.org">kde-edu@mail.kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>