[kde-edu]: edu apps review

[jos poortvliet]

Op Thursday 17 May 2007, schreef Agustin Benito:
> Hi all,
>
> read carefully this e-mail because I think it would be great that somebody
> tells the Edubuntu guys info about kde-edu apps in order to be included in
> future edubuntu releases and have info about your great job in their web.
> In UDS we talked about making a general research of edu apps and it looks
> like Edubuntu wants to do such a think.

Not sure if it would help to tell them about KDE-edu, as they already know 
about it, and they just don't like KDE applications for mostly political 
reasons, at least - that's how it seems to me. They rather ship a worse 
educational cd than include KDE apps.

> saludos
>
> ----------  Mensaje reenviado  ----------
>
> Subject: edubuntu-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 11
> Date: Jueves, 17 de Mayo de 2007 11:00
> From: edubuntu-devel-request at lists.ubuntu.com
> To: edubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> Send edubuntu-devel mailing list submissions to
> 	edubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	edubuntu-devel-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	edubuntu-devel-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of edubuntu-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Call for input: App Review Process Spec (Will van der Leij)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:56:39 +0200
> From: Will van der Leij <will at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Call for input: App Review Process Spec
> To: edubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <464C34E7.4030200 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi all,
>
> One of the specs called for at UDS was a process for reviewing
> applications into Edubuntu.
> I've popped the bulk of the front matter onto
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EdubuntuApplicationReview but am now redoing the
> design section. The scope has changed a bit from what we discussed but
> should make things a bit simpler.
>
> However, thought it would be a good idea to get a call for input on this
> from the folks involved with actually processing the apps to make
> suggestions before I kick into the design sections.
>
> It's quite an important spec as such a tool can help to alleviate the
> wiki clutter involved in such a process (ask any MOTU about that one) as
> well as help formalise things a bit and provide a central point of
> feedback.
>
> All comments greatly encouraged,
> Will van der Leij
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> edubuntu-devel mailing list
> edubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-devel
>
>
> End of edubuntu-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 11
> **********************************************
>
> -------------------------------------------------------



-- 
Disclaimer:

Alles wat ik doe denk en zeg is gebaseerd op het wereldbeeld wat ik nu heb. 
Ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor wijzigingen van de wereld, of het beeld wat 
ik daarvan heb, noch voor de daaruit voortvloeiende gedragingen van mezelf. 
Alles wat ik zeg is aardig bedoeld, tenzij expliciet vermeld.

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

   A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
   Q: Why is top-posting bad?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-edu/attachments/20070517/71fdfb4a/attachment-0001.pgp