[kde-doc-english] katepart doc split
Luigi Toscano
luigi.toscano at tiscali.it
Sun Feb 23 15:21:38 UTC 2014
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> The Great KatePart Doc Split has been committed to the frameworks branch!
>
> The old kwrite doc is gone and replaced with the new katepart doc
> (which looks awfully similar ;-). All content not specific to kate
> was moved from the kate doc into the katepart doc and replaced by
> links.
Thanks for the effort! (maybe a summary of the change could benefit
translators who do not use summit).
> To compile the new katepart doc, you'll need a recent build of
> kdoctools from git (at least up to 5af7fdb). With that version it
> passes checkXML5 and compiles with meinproc5 successfully.
>
> I guess the kwrite Help button goes nowhere now, would a dev mind
> changing it to point at "help:/katepart"? Wasn't quite sure how to do
> that properly. (Or even if khelpcenter is working with KF5 right
> now...)
This is a question for kde-frameworks-devel@ I guess. Better ask now that
after the release.
>
> Anyway, please have a look and make sure I didn't mess anything up.
> :-) If it all looks good, I'll go ahead and move it over to
> ktexteditor.git in a few days.
If you are going to move an existing file from one repository to another,
maybe it would be better to find a way to extract the history too. Alex Merry
kindly helped me with this and promised to document the procedure.
I have a note about one change:
-<date>2013-11-28</date>
-<releaseinfo>3.12 &kde; 4.12</releaseinfo>
+<date>2013-02-22</date>
+<releaseinfo>5.0 &kde; 5.0</releaseinfo>
Like it or not, there is no KDE 5.0, and we should follow the general naming
schema. I think we need to find a different pattern for this releaseinfo. My
proposals:
- only the program/library version (5.0 in this case)
- program/library version + "KF5 based" (which could be a entity).
Ciao
--
Luigi
More information about the kde-doc-english
mailing list