[kde-doc-english]Re: GUI: Capitialization

[Frederik Fouvry]

| > Assuming that some person or some group decided to change the preferred
| > capitialization guidelines without updating the styleguide, why? The vast
| > majority of KDE applications were already conforming to styleguide
| > captialization. For instance, I could only find one flaw in all of KMail.
| > In many cases, a dialog was using styleguide-style capitialization
| > everywhere, with the exception of one or two widgets.
| >
| > It would be an unimaginably vast task to convert all of KDE to another
| > style. Is there any usability or translation benefit to using book title
| > capitialization everywhere that I'm not aware of?
| 
|  As a matter of fact in the spanish team we have supressed book title 
| capitalization everywhere in KDE, since KDE 2.1. We had a long discussion in 
| our team and since book capitalization is incorrect in the spanish grammar 
| except for book titles, we do not use it, even if it does not follow the KDE 
| styleguide. We believed this item of the styleguide was not appliable for our 
| language. 

Exactly: it's language dependent.

Frederik