knoopix tool using qt/Win Free Edition@freenet.de
Peter Kümmel
syntheticpp at gmx.net
Wed Mar 23 11:31:35 CET 2005
Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>Simon Rutishauser wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>To be fully open for the future I prefer this:
>>>>qtnt (not trolltech)
>>>>maybe it's sometimes necessary to add non windows code
>>>>to a code basis not controlled by trolltech.
>>>
>>>
>>>I think this sounds too much like Qt for (Windows) NT. I think for the
>>>moment qtwin is best.
>>>
>>>Simon
>>
>>You are right with 'Windows NT', but I think it's bad to restrict ourself
>>on windows code. What about qt-ex (extensions) or qt-gpl?
>
> I know what you mean because we talked about this, but because there is
> already a gpl-version, qt-gpl isn't the correct name. And qt-ex is to
> specific and would be in competition to other projects trying to extent qt
> like qwt.sf.net.
>
> Christian
>
O.K., at the moment it seems qtwin is the best choice.
Peter
More information about the kde-cygwin
mailing list