knoopix tool using qt/Win Free Edition@freenet.de

[Chris January]

Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> 
>>> Simon Rutishauser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> To be fully open for the  future I prefer this:
>>>>> qtnt (not trolltech)
>>>>> maybe it's sometimes necessary to add non windows code
>>>>> to a code basis not controlled by trolltech.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this sounds too much like Qt for (Windows) NT. I think for the
>>>> moment qtwin is best.
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>> You are right with 'Windows NT', but I think it's bad to restrict 
>>> ourself
>>> on windows code. What about qt-ex (extensions) or qt-gpl?
>>
>>
>> I know what you mean because we talked about this, but because there is
>> already a gpl-version, qt-gpl isn't the correct name. And qt-ex is to
>> specific and would be in competition to other projects trying to 
>> extent qt
>> like qwt.sf.net.
>>
>> Christian
>>
> O.K., at the moment it seems qtwin is the best choice.

FWIW I agree.

Chris