Fwd: Plasma 5.2 bits for kdereview

[Jonathan Riddell]

On 6 January 2015 at 15:23, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:

> Jonathan Riddell ha scritto:
> > Updates on this..
> >
> > I plan to ask for Bluedevil and libbluedevil, libkscreen and kscreen,
> > libmm-qt and ksshaskpass to be moved. I see some comments that the
> > libraries may be used outside of Plasma but there's no problem with
> > that happening, they don't quality for frameworks and they already get
> > released with Plasma so it's just an update in projects.kde.org
> >
>
> That's the same point as baloo, discussed on kde-frameworks-devel right
> now, then.
>
> I still disagree, from a logical point of view those libraries could be
> needed
> both for Applications and Plasma "products". As you said they are not
> frameworks, and I still think we need to investigate how to place this
> kind of
> libraries. If you don't want to depend on libraries on extragear-libs,
> maybe a
> new module? Again, it's the same as the baloo placement problem IMHO.
>

Neither libkscreen nor libbluedevil not libmm-qt are used by anything
outside Plasma currently.

libkscreen and libmm-qt are already being released with Plasma so this just
makes projects.kde.org match reality.

Albert has said he's fine with KDE Applications depending on Plasma (I
think)
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2015-January/021332.html

What problem does it create to release it with Plasma even if something
else wants to use them?

Where would you put them and how would you get them released?

Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150107/98ca804f/attachment.htm>