Moving Baloo forward

[Martin Klapetek]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

>
> Thus my suggestion is that after we get the wiki done and we explain
> clearly
> the situation as Thomas Lübking suggested (i.e. if you really really really
> really need what Nepomuk provides and can't accept a single regression in
> that
> field, do not upgrade), we go ahead with moving to Baloo instead of
> Nepomuk.
>
> What do you think?
>

Sounds like a plan to me. +1

Cheers
-- 
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20140117/0241b10a/attachment.htm>