KDEREVIEW: Mangonel
Albert Astals Cid
aacid at kde.org
Tue Jan 8 22:12:01 GMT 2013
El Dimarts, 8 de gener de 2013, a les 21:08:11, Martin Sandsmark va escriure:
> Dear Sirs and Madams,
>
> Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
>
> Mangonel is a simple and lightweight application launcher in the vein of
> Katapult from ye olde KDE 3 days, kind of reminiscent of the "task oriented"
> UI for krunner, but dropping the slow krunner architecture in favour of a
> simpler and more straightforward one that aims to give immediate feedback
> to the user. So it doesn't do everything krunner does, but should be useful
> for some people as either an alternative to or complement to krunner.
>
> It was originally developed by Bart Kroon, but he is currently too busy to
> work on it, so I got a go-ahead from him to clean it up for a proper release
> with licenses and stuff (which I think it needs because it's pretty useful
> and should be spread far and wide).
Which is its intended destination extragear-something?
Any reason not to use bugs.kde.org?
The i18n is quite broken, a simple grep gives me
./Config.cpp:39: this->setWindowTitle(KApplication::instance()-
>applicationName() + QString(" - Configuration"));
./Config.cpp:48: QLabel* hotkeyLabel = new QLabel("Shortcut to show
Mangonel:", this);
./Mangonel.cpp:74: m_actionShow = new KAction(QString("Show Mangonel"),
this);
./Mangonel.cpp:92: QAction* actionConfig = new QAction(KIcon("configure"),
"Configuration", this);
./Mangonel.cpp:480: m_descriptionLabel = new QGraphicsTextItem("(" +
application.type + ")", this);
Besides all those units in units.c seem untranslatable.
Any reason for not using kunitconversion in there?
Also the units.c copytight header looks a bit scary
Cheers,
Albert
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list