Kdelibs Coding Style vs. preparations for Qt5

[Stephen Kelly]

Thiago Macieira wrote:

> On sábado, 29 de dezembro de 2012 22.58.49, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> On Saturday 29 December 2012 11:06:30 David Faure wrote:
>> > Well, for frameworks that intend to be "as close to Qt as possible"
>> > they should do the same (for the convenience of developers who don't
>> > use qmake/cmake but set up their project configuration in their IDE by
>> > hand, for instance Visual Studio).
>> > This means re-adding the missing QtWidgets/ in public headers once Qt5
>> > is required in KF5.
>> 
>> Out of curiosity, is it something which got documented in the Qt project?
>> Or that's more a custom? (doesn't make it less valid, I'm being curious
>> here and couldn't find the info)
> 
> syncqt complains if public headers have Qt includes that aren't in the
> <QtModule/ClassName> or <QtModule/classname.h> form.
> 

syncqt is a Qt-internal tool. It is relevant to the headers of Qt itself, 
but not relevant outside it.

Thanks,

Steve.