Kdelibs Coding Style vs. preparations for Qt5

[Thiago Macieira]

On sábado, 29 de dezembro de 2012 22.58.49, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Saturday 29 December 2012 11:06:30 David Faure wrote:
> > Well, for frameworks that intend to be "as close to Qt as possible" they
> > should do the same (for the convenience of developers who don't use
> > qmake/cmake but set up their project configuration in their IDE by hand,
> > for instance Visual Studio).
> > This means re-adding the missing QtWidgets/ in public headers once Qt5 is
> > required in KF5.
> 
> Out of curiosity, is it something which got documented in the Qt project? Or
> that's more a custom? (doesn't make it less valid, I'm being curious here
> and couldn't find the info)

syncqt complains if public headers have Qt includes that aren't in the 
<QtModule/ClassName> or <QtModule/classname.h> form.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20121229/a388890b/attachment.sig>