rekonq 2 merged in rekonq main repository

[Sebastian Kügler]

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote:
> Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support for
> private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of
> approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle
> the "private session" cookies in the cookie management dialogs. Anyhow, I
> promised to try and implement this for 4.10, but I could not find the time.
> Perhaps I will find some time during the upcoming holidays.

Is this the same issue that we can't set an empty cookiejar on the webview? 
This issue bit me a while ago when using kdewebkit for an oauth 
implementation, I need an empty cookiejar there because I don't want to 
authenticate an already logged in user. This didn't seem possible, and I think 
the problem still exists. afiestas ran into the same issue.

Or maybe I'm confusing this? :)
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9