rekonq 2 merged in rekonq main repository

[andrea diamantini]

The issue looks very similar, yes.


2012/12/19 Sebastian Kügler <sebas at kde.org>

> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote:
> > Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support
> for
> > private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of
> > approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle
> > the "private session" cookies in the cookie management dialogs. Anyhow, I
> > promised to try and implement this for 4.10, but I could not find the
> time.
> > Perhaps I will find some time during the upcoming holidays.
>
> Is this the same issue that we can't set an empty cookiejar on the webview?
> This issue bit me a while ago when using kdewebkit for an oauth
> implementation, I need an empty cookiejar there because I don't want to
> authenticate an already logged in user. This didn't seem possible, and I
> think
> the problem still exists. afiestas ran into the same issue.
>
> Or maybe I'm confusing this? :)
> --
> sebas
>
> http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
>



-- 

Andrea Diamantini
WEB: http://www.adjam.org

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20121219/c050c646/attachment.htm>