Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday, May 9, 2011 13:53:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> 2011/4/26 Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org>:
> > it's bad practice if it can be fixed in Qt; it's not bad practice if it
> > is something that doesn't belong in Qt. kdelibs should be a value-add
> > extension of Qt for areas that make sense primarily/exclusively to the
> > kinds of apps we create and/or target. it should not be a collection of
> > bug fixes or minor improvements to Qt.
> 
> Both problems fixed in Qt 4.8 with these patches:
> https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/1212
> https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/2610

that is terrific news :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110509/d52dfd22/attachment.sig>