Should kde-qt go 4.7 now?

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday, September 10, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> i would like to at least -try- to get the plasma QML bindings in for
> 4.6 (even if it has still issues that are a bit a showstopper and
> could be not resolved in time), that makes a vote for 4.7 dependency.

this is the real decision making factor imho: are there significant feature 
benefits that KDE applications wish to use? QML is certainly one of them. for 
me, improvements in QtWebKit are another (it makes using QtWebKit actually 
attractive rather than simply bearable imo). are there any others?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100910/1a7b2ed2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100910/1a7b2ed2/attachment.sig>