Fwd: User bus conclusion

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 17:13:20, David Faure 
escreveu:
> > Yes for daemons a user bus sounds good. But not for anything with a
> > GUI - e.g. you wouldn't be able to run any kuniqueapplication
> > twice (once on each display), since the bus would tell it "you're
> > already running".
> 
> Think about it: some of the kuniqueapplications must be relying on
> their uniqueness to access resources that mustn't be shared. Not all
> of them will have additional locks like kmail does.

Well, then those "unique" applications need to be fixed. $HOME on 
network shares is a reality and, judging from complaints on the KDE PIM 
mailing lists, people do start a KDE session on a second computer 
without first logging out of a KDE session running on another computer.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20101110/cca529d6/attachment.sig>